Which is better for you? [Quality]

Moderators: Rich666, PuroresuLove~!

Post Reply
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 31641
Joined: 17 Sep 2013, 15:22

Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by admin »

Can you guys please download these two releases and compare and let me know which is better.
It'll be really helpful.

DDL download

Code: Select all

V1
http://filecloud.io/bmunw4cx9

V2
http://filecloud.io/dh1f3imrs

If you like to donate via paypal or BTC please send a PM.
Every $ helps to keep the site alive.We need donations to fund our server costs so your contribution would mean a lot, no matter the amount you donate.

BTC
37j1MJxmbAYVU2rRmfXWZv7vrEJ9qcqvuF
User avatar
samishii
Posts: 69
Joined: 25 Apr 2015, 22:26

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by samishii »

V2 is better and it oks

V1 looks strange when fighters are in movement (i.e min 33), like shadows or something like that well at least in my pc

p.d; sorry for my bad english :mrgreen:
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 31641
Joined: 17 Sep 2013, 15:22

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by admin »

samishii wrote:V2 is better and it oks

V1 looks strange when fighters are in movement (i.e min 33), like shadows or something like that well at least in my pc

p.d; sorry for my bad english :mrgreen:
thank you

If you like to donate via paypal or BTC please send a PM.
Every $ helps to keep the site alive.We need donations to fund our server costs so your contribution would mean a lot, no matter the amount you donate.

BTC
37j1MJxmbAYVU2rRmfXWZv7vrEJ9qcqvuF
Goddemi
Posts: 6
Joined: 19 Sep 2015, 07:09

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by Goddemi »

I agree with samishii:
V2 is better.
V1 looks bad for fast movement.

How many fps did you set for V1, 25 or less?

The UFC-Videos with 59 fps look very good.
Just like the Video you shared lately:
UFC.203.PPV.Miocic.vs.Overeem.720p.WEB.x264-FMN

Rock on...
cruz
Posts: 49
Joined: 01 Jun 2015, 09:07

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by cruz »

V1 looks horrible. Has this ghosting effect in fast scenes.

V2 looks alright.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 31641
Joined: 17 Sep 2013, 15:22

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by admin »

thanks guys it's deinterlacing problem
I can do better hevc now

If you like to donate via paypal or BTC please send a PM.
Every $ helps to keep the site alive.We need donations to fund our server costs so your contribution would mean a lot, no matter the amount you donate.

BTC
37j1MJxmbAYVU2rRmfXWZv7vrEJ9qcqvuF
SumoX
Posts: 82
Joined: 27 Oct 2013, 12:16

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by SumoX »

imho...
V1 Bad Ghosting... V2 much better (still ghosting, but acceptable/minimal) also not sure but V2 a micro bit sharper...
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 31641
Joined: 17 Sep 2013, 15:22

Re: Which is better for you? [Quality]

Post by admin »

thanks

If you like to donate via paypal or BTC please send a PM.
Every $ helps to keep the site alive.We need donations to fund our server costs so your contribution would mean a lot, no matter the amount you donate.

BTC
37j1MJxmbAYVU2rRmfXWZv7vrEJ9qcqvuF
Post Reply